{"id":792,"date":"2018-07-11T18:12:18","date_gmt":"2018-07-11T10:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/?p=792"},"modified":"2018-07-31T11:38:53","modified_gmt":"2018-07-31T03:38:53","slug":"rottentomatoesturns20-starting-down-the-path-of-rotten-tomatoes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/rottentomatoesturns20-starting-down-the-path-of-rotten-tomatoes\/792\/","title":{"rendered":"Starting down the path of Rotten Tomatoes"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
<\/div>\n

With Rotten Tomatoes<\/a>‘ 20th anniversary rapidly approaching, I’ve decided to do a retrospective on my memories from our early days of Rotten Tomatoes. As \u00a0a Rotten Tomatoes founder along with my partners Patrick Lee<\/a> and Senh Duong<\/a>, I’ve never really had a chance to document some of the stories from our early days. I ask for forgiveness in advance if there are errors as I’m trying to recall details from 20 or more years ago, really a lifetime in internet years (and yet I still feel like it was all so recent).<\/p>\n

Watching Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace<\/a>, released in the summer of 1999, was a life-changing moment for me. No, the movie was an utter letdown for a life-long Star Wars fan like me, but I thank George Lucas for making such a mediocre movie as the online reaction to the movie helped change my mindset about what I wanted to do in life.<\/p>\n

In May 1999, the week before Episode I came out, I got to see the film at an early, private radio promotion screening that also had a few film critics in attendance. When Rotten Tomatoes co-founder Senh asked me earlier in the week whether I wanted to catch a sneak preview of the most anticipated movie of my life (and probably in all of history), of course I replied \u2018yes\u2019 and\u00a0I made the 90 minute drive alone from the San Francisco Bay Area up to Sacramento.<\/p>\n

\n

Senh had launched Rotten Tomatoes nearly a year earlier as a hobby project while working at our web agency at the time. Design Reactor<\/a>, which our third Rotten Tomatoes co-founder and I had started right after my graduation from Cal in 1997, was making rapid headway as the lead web development agency for Disney Channel and at the time I was making a weekly trip back and forth between the Bay Area and Burbank happy and proud to be working for such a prominent client in the field that I loved.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Senh and I at Big Game in November 2005, right before leaving Rotten Tomatoes and continuing my entrepreneurial dreams in China<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Nonetheless, the many sleepless nights of hard work with little outside recognition must had worn down Senh early on. In August 1998 (now 20 years ago!), he had come up with the idea for Rotten Tomatoes. Really, it was quite a genius, thinking out-side-the-box idea at the time and I\u2019m quite envious that I hadn\u2019t thought about it before. Both Senh and I are super movie afficianados. Senh is ethnically Chinese but from Vietnam with a short interlude in Hong Kong before arriving in the relatively rural Sacramento in the 1980\u2019s. For Senh, 80s action stars like Schwarzenegger and Stallone play such a pivotal part of not just his childhood, but also his general perception of Hollywood and America overall. In the same vein, I was equally a movie fan, but my tastes were much more diverse. Senh and I could talk endlessly about our favorite films and directors, but I was also obsessive about small films from mini-majors and indie productions.<\/p>\n

I was born in Ohio, but raised in suburban Maryland. When summers rolled around, my brothers and I would live Los Angeles in the increasingly immigrant Chinese community of Alhambra to see my father. As all my school friends were in Maryland rather than LA, with the lack of friends nearby, my brother and I basically spent every summer going to the movie theater and watching tons of summer movies of every sort. For him, it turned in to a profession\u00a0<\/a>as he chased his moviemaking dreams in Hollywood after college. For me, it meant that movies were always a major part of my life, even after I began chasing my dotcom dreams in college. It was a point of pride for me to have Disney as my major client so soon after graduating college that, unlike Senh, I didn\u2019t really think much of building something \u201ceven greater\u201d.<\/p>\n

For Senh, however, he had more of an \u201cartist\u201d mentality (very similar to a \u201cfounder\u201d mentality) and wasn’t content with essentially working as \u201caffordable labor\u201d for Disney. We couldn\u2019t even publicly claim our hard efforts building such breakthrough projects as Zoog Disney<\/a>, ToonDisney.com<\/a>,\u00a0DisneyChannel.com<\/a>, and eventually much of ABC.com<\/a>. When Jackie Chan, his Hong Kong film idol, was about to star in Rush Hour<\/span><\/em><\/a>, his first major Hollywood movie, Senh devoted his time to building his version of a “fan page”. He collected all of the news articles and film reviews in the weeks preceding the movie\u2019s release and put them on a single page. In reality, while he meant to build a site for\u00a0Rush Hour<\/span><\/em>, since the film\u2019s release got delayed, he actually continued the process of aggregating different review quotations and news headlines for other movies about to release. The first film page to launch was Neil Labute\u2019s Your Friends & Neighbors<\/a>, and by the time it had launched on August 13, 1998, he had already come up with some of Rotten Tomatoes\u2019 key elements: The Tomatometer, Fresh and Rotten icons for reviews, review quotations and links, and the \u201cRotten Tomatoes\u201d name. Senh had even registered the domain name rotten-tomatoes.com<\/a>\u00a0for his new web site. He began posting links to the aggregated Rotten Tomatoes movie review pages to the rec.arts.movies newsgroup and getting decent response from other newsgroup participants.<\/p>\n

Early on, I had concerns about the legality of \u201caggregating quotations and links\u201d. In those early days, the closest comparison would be the Drudge Report, but the quotation aggregation that Senh was doing was even riskier. It\u2019s a commonplace practice now and commonly considered as covered legally under \u201cFair Use\u201d, but back then it was still indeterminate. I think Senh\u2019s \u201cimmigrant outsider\u201d background and his artist mentality were important \u2014 they allowed him to think \u201coutside-of-the-box\u201d and make the important leap to come up something wholly new and innovative by aggregating this quotations, links, and ratings into the Tomatometer where as someone like me born and raised in the U.S. would have considered it too legally risky.<\/p>\n

In the subsequent months, Senh\u2019s \u201cJackie Chan fan project\u201d blossomed in to his passion. He dedicated more and more of his time to updating and expanding Rotten Tomatoes including spending daytime going to the Berkeley Public Library to manually cull quotes from print newspapers and magazines (many of which hadn\u2019t gone online yet in 1998) and all-nighters on the critical Thursday nights before movie openings on Fridays. At the same time, though, our little web design firm Design Reactor, had finally landed on the rollercoaster growth path as our initially small business with Disney Channel blossomed into becoming the primary web agency for the whole of Disney Cable Television. In the several months following the launch of Rotten Tomatoes, our company grew from 6 or 7 employees to 20-plus employees and interns and landed a seven-figure, yearlong deal with Disney to maintain and expand the whole of Disney Channel and affiliated web sites. During all of this, Senh became less and less interested in \u201cworking for Disney\u201d and more and more obsessed with Rotten Tomatoes. Being a fan of movies and a fan of the web site, I helped initially by helping to do some minor programming, hosting the web site on our Design Reactor servers, and making the process easier for Senh by changing his manual HTML pages to more maintainable and reuseable templates. Nonetheless, both Patrick and I could clear see that Senh\u2019s interest in Design Reactor was waning so we asked him to leave the company and so he could work full-time pursuing his Rotten Tomaotes passion and so that we could bring in a replacement as Creative Director (Joe Huang<\/a>) who could dedicate his time to our growing web design company.<\/p>\n

Instead of hanging around the Bay Area and helping us grow Design Reactor, Senh decided to move back to Sacramento and teamed up with his high school classmates Binh Ngo<\/a>\u00a0and Bobby Lee to continue running Rotten Tomatoes from Senh\u2019s garage. In the first couple of months after departing Design Reactor, I don\u2019t think Senh was even 100% certain about using his time to make Rotten Tomatoes a business. There was a short period of time during those early months where the three of them decided to shoot a movie together rather than continue updating Rotten Tomatoes and, as a consequence, there were no updates to the site for several weeks, though they resumed after deciding to not film the indie movie.<\/p>\n

At the same time that Senh, Binh, and Bobby were updating Rotten Tomatoes from Sacramento, I was getting run down by my weekly trips between the Bay Area and Burbank simultaneously growing our Disney business to cover Disney Channel, Zoog Disney, and Toon Disney and producing two new Flash\/Shockwave games for them every week. All of the newfound business from Disney allowed us to move to professional high rise offices in Emeryville and hire a professional CFO for the company. Despite our success with Design Reactor, I was begining to get run down by the constant client-handling and envious of being able to build and own our own property like\u00a0Rotten Tomatoes.<\/p>\n

\n

This was the situation as I drove up to Sacramento to go watch the early critics screening of Star Wars: Episode I<\/i><\/u>\u00a0<\/i>with Senh, Binh, and Bobby that fateful May night. Senh and I had always had a great relationship chatting about movies and, on the car drive over from Senh\u2019s house to the theater, our movie geek conversation about Star Wars continued without missing a beat. After the movie ended, I clearly remember walking out of the theater and noticing other people’s reactions. Before the \u00a0screening, the local radio station had also given tickets to fans. One of the super fans dressed in a Darth Maul costume replete with a homemade, dual-blade light saber and face paint. He walked out of the theater with such a dejected look on his face as if he had just realized that his entire childhood was a lie.<\/p>\n

Leaving the theater, Senh and I talked about what we had just saw. I think we both realized at the same time that this huge build up to the release of Episode I<\/em><\/span>\u00a0was a huge opportunity for Rotten Tomatoes. The fact that the movie was just “so-so” was even better for the web site \u2014 there was going to be some really split opinions about the movie over the subsequent days. During the car ride home, I told Senh that I really wanted to work on Rotten Tomatoes rather than just doing Disney work day-in-and-day-out. I\u2019d talk to Patrick about having Design Reactor dedicate more time and resources towards helping Rotten Tomatoes. Watching Star Wars: Episode I<\/span><\/em> and talking with Senh on that car ride back was a pivotal moment for me. It made me come to realize that, despite how proud I was of the product and relationship we had built with Disney, that what I really wanted out of life was to build something I could claim for my own. I really wanted to work in earnest on Rotten Tomatoes.<\/p>\n

Senh, Binh, and Bobby, while hard-working, didn\u2019t really have much technical knowledge. As a consequence, I sought out at first to help them on the technical end. Firstly, Rotten Tomatoes was still using the \u201crotten-tomatoes.com<\/a>\u201d domain name so after getting back home I immediately went about registering \u201crottentomatoes.com<\/a>\u201d (no dash) which, luckily, had still not been registered. Secondly, we hosted the site on a web server sitting in our Design Reactor offices which helped accomodate the server load in subsequent months. Ironically, by this point in time, becoming Disney\u2019s web agency of choice meant that we were the only agency to have a dual T1 line guaranteeing top-of-the-line network speeds that connected directly to Disney\u2019s private network so that we could develop and test code for all of Disney Channel before deploying to Disney\u2019s production servers. Thanks to Disney paying for our exorbitant (at the time) network line, Rotten Tomatoes was able to share the network access and web server resources in those important summer months in 1999 as site traffic took off.<\/p>\n

True to form, in the several days following that Star Wars: Episode I<\/span><\/em> screening as early reviews began pouring in, the traffic to the site exploded. The day the movie released, the Tomatometer score hovered around 58%-61% and constantly flipped back and forth multiple times between FRESH and ROTTEN as we added newly published reviews (I see now that it’s settled on a more permanent rotten rating<\/a> of 55%). More and more movie fan sites and message boards began linking and referring to Rotten Tomatoes\u2019 Episode I<\/a> web page and traffic continued to pour in. For the first time, the Tomatometer rating became an actual point of conversation amongst critics and tons of Star Wars fans and the reaction to Rotten Tomatoes set us on the path to make this a real project.<\/p>\n

\n

In the subsequent summer weeks, several important things happened to further push us towards making Rotten Tomatoes a full-time business pursuit:<\/p>\n

Around April 1999, my brother, working as an aspiring producer at Sony<\/a> by this point, sent me a video tape of The Blair Witch<\/a><\/i><\/u> Project<\/a>,<\/i>\u00a0<\/em>which had become the buzz hit of Sundance in January but hadn\u2019t released in theaters yet. I had heard so much of this indie horror movie and was even more enthusiastic since it was filmed not too far away from my hometown of Columbia, Maryland. I popped it into the VHS player at the office one weekend and we all watched it together with Senh, who had I believe had also come down from Sacramento to watch with us that weekend. It scared the crap out of some of our teammates, but more importantly, it was pretty obvious after watching the movie that it was pretty special because opinions on the movie were so divided. Patrick, who also grew up in suburban Maryland even closer to where Blair Witch\u00a0<\/i>was shot, absolutely hated the movie, and particularly hated how illogically and childish the characters in the movie acted. I loved the movie and Senh was in the middle with his opinion. We knew that online opinion would also be similarly vociferous.<\/p>\n

Following on Star Wars: Episode I<\/u><\/i>\u00a0in May, the release of The Blair Witch Project<\/i><\/u>\u00a0and all of the film fan discussion in July further confirmed our feeling that Rotten Tomatoes was on to something. People were constantly returning to Rotten Tomatoes to read all of the film reviews, commentary, and debate on such a controversial movie. Because of Episode I<\/u><\/i>\u00a0and Blair Witch<\/i><\/u>, Rotten Tomatoes was becoming more and more known \u2014 Leslie Miller from USA Today featured Rotten Tomatoes<\/a>\u00a0and Netscape selected the site as a \u201cPick of the Day\u201d. Most gratifyingly, Roger Ebert<\/a> highlighted Rotten Tomatoes<\/a> in \u201cYahoo! Internet Life\u201d magazine, a short-lived publication that educated users on the best sites to surf. Roger was an early hero of both Senh and me; consequently, it\u2019s hard to understate how much it meant to us to have his personal validation during our early days.<\/p>\n

Our web design business Design Reactor<\/a> was growing by leaps and bounds. By this point, our business had expanded from just being 90% Disney work, to having a more diverse portfolio of clients adding on Artisan Entertainment<\/a> (who, in a touch of fate, had grown to success with the release of\u00a0The Blair Witch Project<\/i>)\u00a0and Warner Bros.. Despite this success, we were increasingly casting an eye towards building our own project that we could claim for ourselves. At the same time that we moved out of our Berkeley office (a little before the release of Episode I<\/i><\/u>), our office mates Lyle<\/a> and Dennis Fong<\/a> from the original Berkeley office had created Gamers.com<\/a>, the world\u2019s first gaming online portal, and in October 1999 raised $11M, an eye-poppingly big investment back then. I think both Patrick and I were envious of their success and wanted to build something that could surpass our friends’ at Gamers. In this light, it was relatively easy to agree to bring Rotten Tomatoes back into Design Reactor as a full-time project. Seeing as how our web design business was already growing quickly, our original idea was for Senh to move back to the Bay Area and for Design Reactor to incubate Rotten Tomatoes. Patrick talked to some of our potential angel investors, and based off of our success with Design Reactor, they were willing to invest in Design Reactor as an “IdeaLab<\/a>“-style incubator with Rotten Tomatoes as the first incubated project. However, as we began putting the business plan together for Rotten Tomatoes, we quickly came to the realization that our incubator idea was stupid. Life was too short and the three of us were more passionate about building Rotten Tomatoes full-time rather than working across a bunch of projects for others.<\/p>\n

Luckily, our \u00a0investors believed in us as a team and most of them willingly put money in on the basis of Rotten Tomatoes rather than our former \u201cDesign Reactor incubator\u201d plan. In early 2000, I already began transitioning our Disney work (which had expanded to include ABC.com<\/a>)\u00a0over to a sister company. We were already sub-contracting some work to this company and they took over our Design Reactor name and portfolio and we took an equity stake and the decent cash and receivables we had built in the Design Reactor ledger.<\/p>\n

My final project for Design Reactor was in late March 2000 \u2014 I flew down to Hollywood to attend the Academy Awards\u00a0where Design Reactor ran and updated the official Oscars.com<\/a>\u00a0web site during the awards. Subsequent to my work for the ceremony, I flew back to the Bay Area and, in the following week, our one and only round of investment in Rotten Tomatoes arrived in our bank account and I began working on Rotten Tomatoes full-time.<\/p>\n

Then, the very next week, the dotcom bubble burst and things began crashing down around us. That, however, is a story for another post…<\/p>\n

\"\"
Rotten Tomatoes leaders circa April 26, 2000: Paul Lee (business development), Patrick Lee (CEO), Lily Chi (CFO), Senh Duong (COO and creator), and me (CTO)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"\"
The rest of the Rotten Tomatoes team from our office in Emeryville in a San Francisco Chronicle article<\/a> published right after we officially started Rotten Tomatoes as an independent company<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n

For more of my Rotten Tomatoes 20th anniversary articles, check out my other memories<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Postscript:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Like I said, I haven’t really had the opportunity to document our early days at Rotten Tomatoes and there were plenty of people who I’ve neglected to publicly thank. First, of course I want to thank my co-founders Patrick Lee<\/a> and Senh Duong<\/a> and the rest of the Rotten Tomatoes crew who stayed with us through the whole roller-coaster ride: Lily Chi<\/a>, Binh Ngo<\/a>, Paul Lee<\/a>, and Susan Nakasora. Also, thanks to the many other friends who lent a hand during our startup years.<\/em><\/p>\n

Thanks to Larry Barber<\/a>, one of our first Design Reactor clients and an early business advisor. Larry took a look at Patrick and I when we were young, eager 21\/22 year old entrepreneurs and unfailingly believed in our potential. Thanks to Larry’s daughter, the late Cara Barber Hamm<\/a>, who staked her early career at both Disney Channel and Warner Bros. to bring us in to the fold and giving us the first opportunity to shine. Thanks to Brian Bowman<\/a>, who later came in later to head both DisneyChannel.com<\/a>\u00a0and ABC.com<\/a>\u00a0and helped us grow Design Reactor from a startup into a real business. Without Brian, I wouldn’t have spent New Year’s countdown of 2000 hard at work programming the “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” Online Game for launch the following week. The extra-large invoice from that special overtime probably eventually extended Rotten Tomatoes’ runway by a year or two later on when cash was running short.<\/em><\/p>\n

Finally, I want to give a repeated thanks to both Senh, who came up with the idea for Rotten Tomatoes, and also Lyle Fong<\/a>, founder of Gamers.com<\/a>\u00a0which eventually turned in to Lithium<\/a>. Both are immigrant entrepreneurs who had the innate drive to build something great that they could claim for themselves. Without the two of them, I might not have been inspired to take the big step of walking away from Design Reactor and Disney to also pursue my dreams of building something of long-lasting impact and value like Rotten Tomatoes<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How watching the mediocre movie made me build something GREAT<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":795,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9,6,7],"tags":[21,22,20,35,57,140,36,19],"class_list":["post-792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-internet","category-rotten-tomatoes","category-startup","category-stephen-wang","tag-design-reactor","tag-disney-channel","tag-entrepreneurship","tag-patrick-lee","tag-rotten-tomatoes-2","tag-rottentomatoesturns20","tag-senh-duong","tag-startup-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=792"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":811,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792\/revisions\/811"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephenwang.com\/b\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}